🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple businesses who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.