🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I historically avoided significant use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying games. I tended was for story direction and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice instead of random chance. However, I decided to alter my method, and I'm truly glad I did.

The Catalyst: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

A popular streamed game utilizes a DM who frequently requests "fate rolls" from the participants. He does this by picking a type of die and defining potential outcomes based on the roll. It's essentially no unlike consulting a pre-generated chart, these are created spontaneously when a course of events has no clear outcome.

I opted to test this approach at my own table, primarily because it seemed engaging and provided a change from my normal practice. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing dynamic between pre-determination and improvisation in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable Session Moment

During one session, my players had survived a massive battle. Later, a player inquired after two key NPCs—a pair—had lived. In place of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both would perish; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a incredibly poignant sequence where the characters discovered the remains of their friends, forever united in their final moments. The party conducted a ceremony, which was uniquely meaningful due to prior roleplaying. In a concluding reward, I chose that the remains were strangely transformed, showing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's magical effect was perfectly what the group needed to resolve another critical story problem. It's impossible to plan such perfect coincidences.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This incident caused me to question if randomization and spontaneity are actually the beating heart of D&D. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Groups often take delight in upending the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to pivot effectively and create scenarios in the moment.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to train these abilities without going completely outside your preparation. The key is to deploy them for small-scale decisions that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to establish if the central plot figure is a traitor. However, I could use it to decide if the PCs reach a location just in time to see a major incident takes place.

Empowering Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also serves to maintain tension and create the feeling that the adventure is alive, shaping in reaction to their actions as they play. It prevents the perception that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned script, thereby bolstering the collaborative foundation of the game.

This philosophy has always been integral to the game's DNA. Original D&D were filled with charts, which suited a playstyle focused on exploration. While modern D&D tends to focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the best approach.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely no problem with thorough preparation. However, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and permitting the rolls to decide some things rather than you. Direction is a big factor in a DM's role. We need it to run the game, yet we often struggle to release it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final recommendation is this: Have no fear of temporarily losing control. Embrace a little chance for minor story elements. You might just create that the unexpected outcome is significantly more powerful than anything you might have pre-written in advance.